View Full Version : Should Star Trek continue?


Silent Bob
12-15-2006, 01:13 PM
6 series, 8 movies, a gazillion books.

The Trek universe has been around for 40 years. Has it finally worn out?

Miko
12-15-2006, 01:22 PM
Yes. Where's the poll?

Silent Bob
12-15-2006, 01:23 PM
Added :)

arnisador
12-15-2006, 01:55 PM
It can still be reinvented for a new audience.

BRG
12-15-2006, 01:57 PM
Yes, it should continue. But it needs a good long break from TV & cinema to re-energise the fanbase- like the 10 years between the end of TOS until the first film.

I think it should be put on hold until the 50th anniversary in 2016, by that time we will be gagging for new Star Trek. Then have a big buget movie, followed by a new TV series.
BRG

Wolf Braun
12-15-2006, 02:51 PM
I went with yes.

BRG's got a point though, let the network/studio drought continue for a while though, to build up the energy.

In the meantime though, Trek wil never die as long as there are fans to keep it alive on the net.

Bryan R
12-15-2006, 04:16 PM
I am on BRG side here - minimum wait until 2011 that is a 45 year anniversary and then look at bringing Star Trek back with fresh ideas/stories.

iseijinryoushi
12-15-2006, 04:24 PM
OK, who is the red shirt that voted no. I give you 5 seconds when you hit the planet. ;)

Randalt
12-15-2006, 05:34 PM
It is continuing, with the online game due in 2007/08 (cross fingers they don't muck it up :))